Re: Library packaging

To: peter karlsson <peter@softwolves.pp.se>
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Library packaging
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2002 01:58:55 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 20020316015855.03cc4efd.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.43.0203130652090.23899-100000@perkele>
References: <[🔎] 20020313100423.391d6200.dancer@netfort.gr.jp> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.43.0203130652090.23899-100000@perkele>

peter karlsson <peter@softwolves.pp.se> cum veritate scripsit:

> > Binary package names are incorrect, name them "lib"mowitz0 and
> > "lib"mowitz-dev
> 
> Okay. I was a bit uncertain about that. I just used the names that
> dh_make used.


If that's the case, I also have doubts whether it should be 
called libmowitz"0"

Are you sure of the soname version number?


regards,
	junichi

-- 
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa   http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423  7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Library packaging
  - From: peter karlsson <peter@softwolves.pp.se>

References:
- Re: Library packaging
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
- Re: Library packaging
  - From: peter karlsson <peter@softwolves.pp.se>

Prev by Date: Bug#138451: xmms-cdread: Segfaults when trying to play CD
Next by Date: Re: debconf
Previous by thread: Re: Library packaging
Next by thread: Re: Library packaging
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread