Re: FHS ambiguity: /usr/lib or /usr/share?
On Thu, 2002-11-14 at 10:21, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> I can't come to agreement with Alicq upstream about where is a proper
> place to put Alicq optional modules (written in Tcl). FHS 2.1 contains
> self-contradictory recommendations on that issue: on one hand, .tcl
> files are arch-independent and thus belong to /usr/share, OTOH
> /usr/share is supposed to contain _data_ files, while libraries and
> modules should go to /usr/lib.
Java programs/libraries (arch independent bytecode) all go in
/usr/share/java, as per policy. I guess your situation isn't all that
different, so they should go in /usr/share, IMHO.
--
.''`. Mark Howard
: :' :
`. `' http://www.tildemh.com
`- mh@debian.org | mh@tildemh.com | mh344@cam.ac.uk
Reply to: