Re: FHS ambiguity: /usr/lib or /usr/share?
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 12:21:59PM +0200, Dmitry Borodaenko wrote:
> I can't come to agreement with Alicq upstream about where is a proper
> place to put Alicq optional modules (written in Tcl). FHS 2.1 contains
> self-contradictory recommendations on that issue: on one hand, .tcl
> files are arch-independent and thus belong to /usr/share, OTOH
> /usr/share is supposed to contain _data_ files, while libraries and
> modules should go to /usr/lib.
I don't really know about the response to this one, but i thought the
point of using /usr/share is that you could remote mount it on multiple
system, which may not all be using the same arch, while /usr/lib is arch
dependant.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: