Re: build failures & compiler versions

To: "Neil L. Roeth" <neil@occamsrazor.net>
Cc: Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: build failures & compiler versions
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 14:28:54 +0900
Message-id: <[🔎] 87adkt504p.wl@atoron.work.isl.doshisha.ac.jp>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 15809.64237.810602.910306@laptank.occamsrazor.net>
References: <20021030170853.GA1179@gashuffer.lobefin.net> <20021030180231.GB14676@netexpress.net> <15808.41465.432888.733218@laptank.occamsrazor.net> <20021031031531.GB17508@netexpress.net> <15809.6856.363224.76429@laptank.occamsrazor.net> <878z0eycat.wl@vivare.dancer.pr.jp> <[🔎] 15809.64237.810602.910306@laptank.occamsrazor.net>

>  > > Who can I ask to untweak the s390 buildd, and get my package rebuilt?
>  > > 
>  > That's not the point of the bug report,
>  > you should fix your package to build with gcc-3.2, so
>  > that the switchover may happen with less pain.
> 
> I will attempt to build it with 3.2 on i386.  I was a bit surprised that a bug
> was filed against it for that reason.  Is that now automatic with all packages
> being uploaded that fail to build with 3.2?

I don't think it's automatic, I believe it is done manually.
He's been filing few bugs every day, I think.

I don't think any bug filing is automatic currently at all.



regards,
	junichi

Reply to:

References:
- Re: build failures & compiler versions
  - From: "Neil L. Roeth" <neil@occamsrazor.net>

Next by Date: Re: build failures & compiler versions
Previous by thread: Re: build failures & compiler versions
Next by thread: Re: build failures & compiler versions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread