Re: build failures & compiler versions
- To: Debian Mentors <debian-mentors@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: build failures & compiler versions
- From: "Neil L. Roeth" <neil@occamsrazor.net>
- Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 22:54:21 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 15809.64237.810602.910306@laptank.occamsrazor.net>
- In-reply-to: <878z0eycat.wl@vivare.dancer.pr.jp>
- References: <20021030170853.GA1179@gashuffer.lobefin.net> <20021030180231.GB14676@netexpress.net> <15808.41465.432888.733218@laptank.occamsrazor.net> <20021031031531.GB17508@netexpress.net> <15809.6856.363224.76429@laptank.occamsrazor.net> <878z0eycat.wl@vivare.dancer.pr.jp>
On Oct 31, Junichi Uekawa (dancer@netfort.gr.jp) wrote:
> At Thu, 31 Oct 2002 06:58:00 -0500,
> Neil L. Roeth <neil@occamsrazor.net> wrote:
>
> > > So, gcc 2.95 is still supposed to be what s390 uses. Sounds like someone
> > > has "tweaked" the s390 buildd.
> >
> > Who can I ask to untweak the s390 buildd, and get my package rebuilt?
> >
> That's not the point of the bug report,
> you should fix your package to build with gcc-3.2, so
> that the switchover may happen with less pain.
I will attempt to build it with 3.2 on i386. I was a bit surprised that a bug
was filed against it for that reason. Is that now automatic with all packages
being uploaded that fail to build with 3.2?
--
Neil L. Roeth
Reply to: