On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 07:01:01PM -0800, David Kimdon wrote: [snip] > Put another way, the orig directory you used was the 1.51-5 debianized > source dir, it should have been the pristine upstream source. right, i was missing the point (stupid error btw). new packages on http://debian.esaurito.net should work. anyway fortunes-it is fixed [1] by frankie@debian.org so this is quite useless work but your tips help me anyway, thanks. > > > > and a diff. For doc-linux-sv the souce package started out wrong, so > > > that isn't your fault, you can leave it as it is. > > ok, i've fixed also doc-linux-sv with NMU changelog and correct version. > > > > Same problem with this one, the orig should not be the previous debian > version, but should be the pristine upstream tarball. doc-linux-sv > had an incorrect source package to start out with (the version number > indicates it is not a debian native package, but the absence of a diff > indicates that it is debian-native, this is likely the source of our > confusion). If I were you I would leave that source package broken > and just fix the RC bug. (perhaps report a bug on the broken source > package as well) ok, RC bug #140137 is open, should I open a new one against doc-linux-sv with (trivial) patch attached? when trying to fix #161852 on http-analyze i encountered the same problem (no .orig file only .dsc and debianized .tar.gz) cheers, filippo. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=147018&repeatmerged=yes -- Filippo Giunchedi GNU/PG key id: 1024D/6B79D401 Random signature follows: Linux IS user friendly, it is just selective who his friends are.
Attachment:
pgpAv1pLlZKGJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature