Re: substvar in Arch:

[Sven LUTHER <luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr>]

On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 10:40:04AM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 04:42:48AM +0200, Goswin Brederlow wrote:
> > on all archs having the compiler and fail on others. This should not
> > prevent the package from going into testing or stable as long as no
> > previous package exists for one of the failing archs.
> 
> Ok, but is this a supposed "clean" way to go, or it is only a
> side-effect of the testing script on which is better not to rely?

Well, we gained no additional info on asking jere, so let's go for the
build depend, and worry later if this don't work.

Or is there another list where we could ask.

Friendly,

Sven Luther