Re: upstream numbering scheme debian compliant ?
On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 03:09:58PM -0300, Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote:
> > > > The current gphoto2 release is 2.0beta5 wich is packaged as 2.0beta5.
> > > > For the final release 2.0, I will package it as 2.0final.
> > > >
> > > > What would be the best numbering scheme for the next beta series to
> > > > avoid the use of final for the stable release ?
> why don't you do 2.0beta2 then -> 1:2.0 ? I think it is quite consistent
Don't use epochs when you can use something else. Epochs are usually for
workarounds after someone screwed up a version.
--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.
Reply to: