Re: upstream numbering scheme debian compliant ?
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 09:46:19 -0500
christophe barbé <christophe.barbe.ml@online.fr> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2002 at 02:48:57PM +0100, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > > The current gphoto2 release is 2.0beta5 wich is packaged as 2.0beta5.
> > > For the final release 2.0, I will package it as 2.0final.
> > >
> > > What would be the best numbering scheme for the next beta series to
> > > avoid the use of final for the stable release ?
why don't you do 2.0beta2 then -> 1:2.0 ? I think it is quite consistent
[~]
[kov]@[couve] $ dpkg --compare-versions "2.0beta2" lt "1:2.0" ; echo $?
0
[]s!
--
kov@debian.org: Gustavo Noronha <http://www.metainfo.org/kov>
Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://debian-br.cipsga.org.br>
Reply to: