On Sun, Nov 25, 2001 at 08:49:30AM -0500, Adam C Powell IV wrote: > > Right, but it seems policy does not allow a contrib source package to > put binaries in both contrib and main. It's a policy issue, not a > technical one: if a package is "tainted" with a non-free build-dep or > dep for a single binary package on a single arch, then the whole thing > is thrown into contrib. > > And I've decided it's not worth duplicating the source package for > faster performance on this one arch, I've put enough work into the > package so that it's trivial for a user to build his/her own .debs with > the non-free compilers/libs. (Haven't tested gcc-3.0 yet, it's very > possible the performance difference bet ccc/cfal and gcc/g77-3.0 will be > a lot narrower than vs. gcc/g77-2.95.) I'm sorry, I think I was tired and I misunderstood your question. You should better forget everything I wrote, it was only crap... Regards, Nicolas
Attachment:
pgpzP18dTSSXA.pgp
Description: PGP signature