[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#119605: pcscd: does not kill daemon on purge (fwd)



Hi,

This bug is about the pcscd daemon left running afer purging the pcscd
package.

I'm not able to reproduce this error on an Intel machine. Maybe it's an
Sparc specific bug. I don't have such a machine at hand and thats why I'm
asking for help on this list.

The pcscd.prerm does stop the proccess in the usual way (in fact it's
dh_installinit the one that adds this part of the script in the same way
than for other debian packages): /etc/init.d/pcscd stop

/etc/init.d/pcscd just calls start-stop-daemon --stop --quiet --oknodo
--pidfile /var/run/pcscd.pid

The file pcscd.pid is created from within pcscd and contains the pid of
the daemon.

If anybody can check it dpkg --purge pcscd leaves pcscd processes running,
on an sparc machine, please let me know.

Thanks,
Carlos.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 10:36:02 -0500
From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
To: Carlos Prados <cprados@debian.org>
Cc: 119605@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#119605: pcscd: does not kill daemon on purge
Resent-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2001 15:48:03 GMT
Resent-From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-cc: Carlos Prados <cprados@debian.org>

On Sat, Nov 24, 2001 at 12:34:35PM +0100, Carlos Prados wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> I've double-checked that the pcscd is shutdown before removing the
> package.
>
> Wich test did you made that left the daemon running? Were there some
> packages depending on pcscd/on wich pscscd depends around while purging?

pcscd got installed on the sparc buildd to satisfy a dependency for a
package build. When it was later removed (via apt-get --purge), it left
the daemon running.


Ben

-- 
 .----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=-----.
/                   Ben Collins    --    Debian GNU/Linux                  \
`  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  bcollins@linux.com  '
 `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'



Reply to: