Re: lintian goes wild?
Hi Christian!
You wrote:
> Operator or semicolon missing before &supported at (eval 115) line 1.
> Ambiguous use of & resolved as operator & at (eval 115) line 1.
> Unquoted string "supported" may clash with future reserved word at (eval
> 112) line 1.
Looks like a bug in lintian to me. Have you tried contacting the lintian
maintainers?
--
Kind regards,
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bas Zoetekouw | Si l'on sait exactement ce |
|--------------------------------| que l'on va faire, a quoi |
| zoetekw@phys.uu.nl | bon le faire? |
| bas@A-Es2.uu.nl | Pablo Picasso |
+---------------------------------------------------------------+
Reply to: