Re: Lintian error: depends-on-essential-package-without-using-version bash
On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 02:52:52PM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2001 at 03:20:28AM +1000, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > Lastly, is there a reliable way of confirming that I do not in fact have any
> > bashisms, so that #!/bin/sh would be sufficient? sh is linked to bash, so
> > simply writing #!/bin/sh in the script is not sufficient.
>
> I tried ash, it gave the error:
>
> [: ==: unexpected operator
That one's easy, = instead of == is more portable in test (or [)
constructs.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
Reply to: