Re: Why this?
On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:46:50PM +0100, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote:
> On Monday 27 November 2000 19:39, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
>
> > > Hi
> >
> > I wonder about this error:
> > ...SNIP...
> > N: Processing binary package libmcal0 (version 0.6-3) ...
> > E: libmcal0: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib usr/lib/libmcal.so.0.6
> > libmcal N:
> > N: The package should not only include the shared library itself, but
> > N: also the symbolic link which ldconfig would produce. (This is
> > N: necessary, so that the link gets removed by dpkg automatically when
> > N: the package gets removed.)
> > N:
> > N: Refer to Policy Manual, section 4.3 for details.
> > N:
> > N: Processing binary package libmcal-dev (version 0.6-3) ...
> > ...SNIP...
> >
> > Why does this occur? And what should I do about it?
>
> I think libmcal0 package should have a symlink libmcal.so.0->libmcal.so.0.6.
The strange thing is that I have that. Verified via install and check :)
// Ola
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Björnkärrsgatan 5 A.11 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 584 36 LINKÖPING |
| +46 (0)13-17 69 83 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: