[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Why this?

On Monday 27 November 2000 19:39, Ola Lundqvist wrote:

> > Hi
> I wonder about this error:
> ...SNIP...
> N: Processing binary package libmcal0 (version 0.6-3) ...
> E: libmcal0: ldconfig-symlink-missing-for-shlib usr/lib/libmcal.so.0.6
> libmcal N:
> N:   The package should not only include the shared library itself, but
> N:   also the symbolic link which ldconfig would produce. (This is
> N:   necessary, so that the link gets removed by dpkg automatically when
> N:   the package gets removed.)
> N:
> N:   Refer to Policy Manual, section 4.3 for details.
> N:
> N: Processing binary package libmcal-dev (version 0.6-3) ...
> ...SNIP...
> Why does this occur? And what should I do about it?

I think libmcal0 package should have a symlink libmcal.so.0->libmcal.so.0.6.


Mariusz Przygodzki        |  Good judgement comes from experience.
dune@home.pl              |  Experience comes from bad judgement.
http://www.dune.home.pl   |
GPG KeyID: 0x42FAD771 
GPG Fingerprint: 1990 F07B FFB4 BE0B FF26 10C2 BE2B 965C 42FA D771

Reply to: