Re: License issue
- To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: License issue
- From: peter karlsson <email@example.com>
- Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2000 23:54:40 +0200 (CEST)
- Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0010282353080.464-100000@perkele>
- In-reply-to: <20001028234658.A9585@magi.sukisuki.org>
Oliver M . Bolzer <firstname.lastname@example.org>:
> OUT. Undoubtly against DFSG point 6.
> OUT. Undoubtly against DFSG point 3, also the exceptions of point 4 are
> not applicible.
> Again point 5
All right. As I thought, then.
> Maybe you could try to convince upstream to change the licence. He wants
> to have an "opensource" licence, but as the current licence is not DFSG-free,
> it is not opensource (the OpenSource guidelines were created based on the
I just sent off an e-mail to him, asking for advice on the issue. Let's
see what the answer is.
> And BTW, the apropriate forum for this discussion would be debian-legal
> where all the expoerts on these matter live.
Oh, sorry. I'll remember that next time (I'm still quite new to being a
peter - http://www.softwolves.pp.se/
Statement concerning unsolicited e-mail according to Swedish law: