Re: r-pdl vs. pdl (was Re: Semi-retiring: All (ok, some) packages must go!)
*Raul Miller wrote:
> PDL currently contains R. If you want to get r-pdl out before
> the freeze, that's excellent. I'll want to pull R from pdl before
> the freeze if you do that.
This fixes the problem. The documentation has an error in it.
use PDL;
use PDL::R;
...
I omitted the line 'use PDL;' in the documentation. I don't know how many
people use PDL::R. I do; but I can always install the old r-pdl package for
myself. I got mail from someone who at least tried it. You may ask on the
pdl list if people object to your removing R support.
Man, I really wish I had time to deal with this properly! Thanks for
taking over. When I finish this damn dissertation, I'll do more software stuff.
(Please cc me, I don't read the lists very often)
John
--
John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.arizona.edu>, lapeyre@debian.org
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
Reply to: