Re: 2 packages using same conffile

To: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@earthlink.net>
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: 2 packages using same conffile
From: apharris@burrito.onshore.com (Adam P. Harris)
Date: 06 Jul 1998 14:53:30 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] oak95q24lx.fsf@burrito.fake>
In-reply-to: Joseph Carter's message of "Sun, 5 Jul 1998 13:47:28 +0000"
References: <[🔎] 19980705073130.B1271@earthlink.net> <[🔎] hhww9sfn07.fsf@dres.elam.org> <[🔎] 19980705134728.E1437@earthlink.net>

Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@earthlink.net> writes:
> In general, irc-common does seem kinda ugly.

If there's reason, we could try to get it into a required package,
probably base-files.
-- 
.....A. P. Harris...apharris@onShore.com...<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-mentors-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 2 packages using same conffile
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@earthlink.net>

References:
- 2 packages using same conffile
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@earthlink.net>
- Re: 2 packages using same conffile
  - From: James LewisMoss <dres@dimensional.com>
- Re: 2 packages using same conffile
  - From: Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: config file handling
Next by Date: Re: libc5 version of libdb2?
Previous by thread: Re: 2 packages using same conffile
Next by thread: Re: 2 packages using same conffile
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread