Re: bo-unstable: which `Distribution' field is right?

To: tibor simko <tibor.simko@aleph.dpp.fmph.uniba.sk>
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: bo-unstable: which `Distribution' field is right?
From: Martin Schulze <joey@kuolema.Infodrom.North.DE>
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 20:49:13 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980217204913.08605@kuolema>
Reply-to: Martin Schulze <joey@infodrom.north.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87btw6nrad.fsf@aleph.dpp.fmph.uniba.sk>; from tibor simko on Tue, Feb 17, 1998 at 05:13:14PM +0100
References: <[🔎] 87btw6nrad.fsf@aleph.dpp.fmph.uniba.sk>

On Tue, Feb 17, 1998 at 05:13:14PM +0100, tibor simko wrote:
> hi mentors:
> 
> i'd like to ask what is the correct way to upload a bo-compiled
> `foo_1.0bo1' debian package into bo-unstable.  namely, i saw people
> specifying either of the:
> 
>   Distribution: bo-unstable

This should be it.

Regards,

	Joey

-- 
  / Martin Schulze  *  joey@infodrom.north.de  *  26129 Oldenburg /
 /                 Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only /
/          proved it correct, not tried it.  -- Donald E. Knuth /

Reply to:

References:
- bo-unstable: which `Distribution' field is right?
  - From: tibor simko <tibor.simko@aleph.dpp.fmph.uniba.sk>

Prev by Date: Packaging imlib
Next by Date: Re: bo-unstable: which `Distribution' field is right?
Previous by thread: bo-unstable: which `Distribution' field is right?
Next by thread: Re: bo-unstable: which `Distribution' field is right?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread