Aw: Re: Do we need the Python interface of ghmm
Hi Andreas,
it will be best to remove it, I suggest. I do not have any personal contact to upstream, somehwat unfortunate since this looks very nice and educational, but ... unless someone enjoys such a transition, I suggest to just wait for a version 0.10.
Best,
Steffen
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 07. Februar 2024 um 14:02 Uhr
> Von: "Andreas Tille" <andreas@an3as.eu>
> An: "Debian Med Project List" <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
> Cc: "Steffen Möller" <steffen_moeller@gmx.de>
> Betreff: Re: Do we need the Python interface of ghmm
>
> Hi again,
>
> if there is no response of kind "Yes, please try to keep the Python
> interface of ghmm" it will be removed soon.
>
> Kind regards
> Andreas.
>
> Am Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 07:58:34AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille:
> > Hi Steffen (and two whom it might concern),
> >
> > when Israel has written the autopkgtest for ghmm it turned
> > out that there are several issues with the Python3 interface.
> > In Matrix Nilesh raised the perfectly valid question:
> >
> > The py interface is living off a patch from py2to3 and is (very)
> > broken. It needs quite a lot of patching. Maybe it's a sensible thing to
> > evaluate if we even need it?
> >
> > Could you please state your opinion about this?
> >
> > We should respond in a timely manner to the atlas removal
> > effort (patch in Git) and currently it is blocked by the
> > test suite issue of the Python3 interface.
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Andreas.
> >
> > --
> > http://fam-tille.de
> >
> >
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
Reply to: