Re: Help for unifrac autopkgtest needed
Hi Étienne,
Am Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 10:46:26PM +0100 schrieb Étienne Mollier:
>
> Probably nothing outstanding, liblapacke introduced the ztrsyl3_
> in its version 3.11 and unifrac built against that, but the test
> might have run against liblapacke 3.10 in testing which didn't
> have this symbal.
Sounds like a sensible explanation. However, I checked again the debci
log[1] and compared with Salsa CI[2]. Both are mentioning lapacke 3.11
in the package installation section. Salsa CI passes the test while
debci is failing. May be waiting a bit longer can help and the
skikit-learn issue is interfering the migration anyway.
Kind regards
Andreas.
> > [1] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/u/unifrac/28811608/log.gz
[2] https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/unifrac/-/jobs/3595307
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: