[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: python3-biopython: incompatible with muscle >= 5



Hi all,

Andreas Tille, on 2022-11-24:
> Am Thu, Nov 24, 2022 at 06:58:04PM +0100 schrieb Étienne Mollier:
> > Thanks for the upload, I further adjusted the muscle wrapper so
> > it would catch the muscle3 binary if it finds it in the path, as
> > I see your new package provides the executable /usr/bin/muscle3.
> > If no such executable is available, the default switches to
> > plain muscle.  In any case it is possible for a user of the
> > biopython wrapper to enforce a given executable name by setting
> > the cmd argument of the constructor.  Changes are available in
> > the muscle3 patch[2] on salsa.  I'm hopeful to upload biopython
> > 1.80 to experimental this evening.
> 
> This sounds all very sensible.  Thanks a lot

This is also all very experimental.  ;)

python-biopython 1.80 is uploaded to experimental and should
build soon[1], if this is not the case already.  I haven't had a
lot of opportunities to extensively test interactions between
muscle3 and 5; I guess the situation will be clearer when
muscle3 makes it through NEW.  It would be nice that people
using biopython and muscle give this a try as early as possible.

[1]: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=python-biopython&suite=experimental

Have a nice day,  :)
-- 
Étienne Mollier <emollier@emlwks999.eu>
Fingerprint:  8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
Sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity.
On air: Martin Orford - Out in the Darkness

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: