Re: Plastimatch new version

HI Etienne,

Thank you, you are correct! Yahoo blocked your direct e-mail, but it also blocked the one from debian-med which is not good.

Looks like I did not correctly understand autopkgtest. Would you recommend reverting the debian-tests-data removal or adjusting run-unit-test? And how do I keep up on the best practice in Debian packaging, is there any training you can recommend?

Regarding plastimatch/libs, hope to have good news for the next upstream release.

Greg Sharp
gregsharp@geocities.com

On Thursday, November 17, 2022, 03:00:33 PM EST, Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org> wrote:

Hi Greg,

Gregory Sharp, on 2022-11-17:
> Just a ping. This is still ready for review and upload. Please let me know if I missed something.

Your mail provider seems to have filtered out [1], so I retry
with my debian.org address (in case I broke something with my
emlwks999.eu one; I'm not an email administrator and sometimes
it shows). For short, removing the dataset seems to have broken
the autopkgtest.

[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2022/11/msg00008.html

On Thursday, November 3, 2022, 03:14:53 PM EDT, Gregory Sharp <gregsharp.geo@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I have updated plastimatch for the new upstream version, and it is ready for review and upload.

Have a nice day, :)
--
.''`. Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org>
: :' : gpg: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
`. `' sent from /dev/tty1, please excuse my verbosity
`- on air: Allen/Olzon - One More Chance