Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk
- To: "Aaron M. Ucko" <ucko@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-med@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Finishing ncbi-vdb and sra-sdk
- From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:43:40 +0100
- Message-id: <Y3I3/GQORAyKCNw8@an3as.eu>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] udlzgcui3eo.fsf@mit.edu>
- References: <udl4jwboz1h.fsf@mit.edu> <Y0VlewFkmY2tQ4id@an3as.eu> <udltu4aldbf.fsf@mit.edu> <07f3b711-6ded-356b-24d5-b7b51dde4b9c@debian.org> <udlmta1lptb.fsf@mit.edu> <5300a688-9c80-83bb-3714-4cae4eb8607f@debian.org> <udlr0zb5kxv.fsf@mit.edu> <50520d41-9eb1-27c9-0b74-a7280e699c6b@debian.org> <udl35bnqhvo.fsf@mit.edu> <[🔎] udlzgcui3eo.fsf@mit.edu>
Hi Aaron,
thanks for all your work on this.
Am Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 11:08:31PM -0500 schrieb Aaron M. Ucko:
> I realized at the last minute (in the course of confirming that sra-sdk
> passes its autopkgtest) that I never merged in ngs-sdk's, which is
> likely to need formal adjustments per layout changes; we should try to
> remember to do so before uploading to unstable.
Possibly it helps to remember if you would push the according commits
and create the d/changelog entry accordingly.
> Also, while scanning for copyright notices, I observed convenience
> copies of several separately packaged libraries. I left their handling
> as is for now, but it would be good to look into switching to the
> separately packaged copies.
I confirm that I was afraid about the complexity here and thus left
alone most code copies but for sure any cleanup would be very sensible
here.
Thanks again
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: