Re: suggesting dnarrange and lamassemble

To: "Frith, Martin" <mcfrith@edu.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
Cc: Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: suggesting dnarrange and lamassemble
From: Nilesh Patra <nilesh@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 12:06:06 +0530
Message-id: <[🔎] 20220711063606.vojzxzaotoqb7b5e@debian>
In-reply-to: <CABqYRe-eo2QNPNpFub6SdVkaNS09yFcUstr3jm9_y6rK0vzFUA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABqYRe-GsYO3z0nQOeMfzmiVSSjR98VrA68PuHK+npN2NA4BTQ@mail.gmail.com> <YpNNhejp/sQBKakl@debian> <CABqYRe-eo2QNPNpFub6SdVkaNS09yFcUstr3jm9_y6rK0vzFUA@mail.gmail.com>

Hi again,

On Sun, May 29, 2022 at 10:10:14PM +0900, Frith, Martin wrote:
> Wow, amazingly fast!!!

lamassemble fails its tests on i386 (see here[1]) -- could you fix accordingly?

[1]: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/i386/l/lamassemble/22546451/log.gz

-- 
Best,
Nilesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: suggesting dnarrange and lamassemble
  - From: "Frith, Martin" <mcfrith@edu.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp>
- Re: suggesting dnarrange and lamassemble
  - From: "Frith, Martin" <mcfrith@edu.k.u-tokyo.ac.jp>

Prev by Date: Bug#1014695: RM: nanopolish [s390x] -- ROM; nanopolish transitively depends on streamvbyte which does not build on s390x
Next by Date: Re: suggesting dnarrange and lamassemble
Previous by thread: Bug#1014695: RM: nanopolish [s390x] -- ROM; nanopolish transitively depends on streamvbyte which does not build on s390x
Next by thread: Re: suggesting dnarrange and lamassemble
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread