Re: ncbi-igblast - compiles so much redundant general NCBI bits - wrong source tree?

To: <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: ncbi-igblast - compiles so much redundant general NCBI bits - wrong source tree?
From: ucko@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko)
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2022 16:13:54 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] udlwngnjc71.fsf@mit.edu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] YjhU3hMteQ4s0IJh@an3as.eu> (Andreas Tille's message of "Mon, 21 Mar 2022 11:35:10 +0100")
References: <f2777146-5df1-2200-1022-1397ce332c0e@gmx.de> <udl7dxnolq0.fsf@mit.edu> <[🔎] YjhU3hMteQ4s0IJh@an3as.eu>

Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> writes:

> ERR [127] --  [util/lmdb] lmdb_test.sh 1     (unparsable timing stats)

Please try declaring a build dependency on time.

FTR, my previous suggestion (switching from --with-dll to --without-dll)
addressed an unrelated concern Steffen had raised, namely using a very
similar set of private shared libraries to what ncbi-blast+ has.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: ncbi-igblast - compiles so much redundant general NCBI bits - wrong source tree?
  - From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>

References:
- Re: ncbi-igblast - compiles so much redundant general NCBI bits - wrong source tree?
  - From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: ismrmrd has cmake build issue
Next by Date: Re: ncbi-igblast - compiles so much redundant general NCBI bits - wrong source tree?
Previous by thread: Re: ncbi-igblast - compiles so much redundant general NCBI bits - wrong source tree?
Next by thread: Re: ncbi-igblast - compiles so much redundant general NCBI bits - wrong source tree?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread