packaging new upstream camitk version (was: Bug#997120:)
Dear Andreas,
I managed to get the package to build (and not just the binaries!)
and autopkgtest to run without error.
I just pushed the required modification and two patches.
Note that I had to use sed in d/rules for
override_dh_auto_configure, hope that's ok.
Lintian still generates the following warnings:
W: libcamitk-dev: breaks-without-version libvtk6-dev
W: libcamitk-dev: breaks-without-version libvtk6-java
W: libcamitk-dev: breaks-without-version libvtk6-jni
W: libcamitk-dev: breaks-without-version libvtk6-qt-dev
W: camitk-actionstatemachine-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers:
Unable to find program interpreter name
[usr/lib/debug/.build-id/83/0781678cd786e5d7340380a0d1074859ea04dd.debug]
W: camitk-config-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers: Unable to
find program interpreter name
[usr/lib/debug/.build-id/40/79f01584001da5d32afc39dbf8c4adb7712db1.debug]
W: camitk-imp-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers: Unable to find
program interpreter name
[usr/lib/debug/.build-id/c4/7f965eb7c264b0ef8c8d30f7dce4b2efb95156.debug]
W: libcamitk-dev-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers: Unable to
find program interpreter name
[usr/lib/debug/.build-id/6f/09e2cf16e8735811b635934b45cb9ba5685c17.debug]
W: libcamitk-dev-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers: Unable to
find program interpreter name
[usr/lib/debug/.build-id/a3/619ed63907cc10f5dad87bb69191821ccbbac5.debug]
W: libcamitk-dev-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers: Unable to
find program interpreter name
[usr/lib/debug/.build-id/b5/d4c9c627c9b6299d54cd0bfe137d1258917cab.debug]
W: libcamitk-dev-dbgsym: elf-error In program headers: Unable to
find program interpreter name
[usr/lib/debug/.build-id/cc/46eb2adbcb8ae5b43f61ff4ed3702940e121e8.debug]
N: 1 hint overridden (1 warning); 0 unused overrides
I am not sure how to deal with both:
- breaks-without-version → when I tried adding "(>= 6.3.0)" in
d/control, running "cme check dpkg-control" said "unnecessary
greater-than versioned dependency")
- elf-error → this one I don't really understand!
Would it be possible for you to check this?
Thanks again,
Emmanuel
Reply to: