Re: New version of snpeff in Git (Was: snpeff_4.3t+dfsg1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED)
Le 03/02/2022 à 10:31, Andreas Tille a écrit :
Am Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 09:49:32PM +0100 schrieb Pierre Gruet:
I did the upload -- I agree autopkgtests would be valuable, still. Yet I
remember the tests I did when designing the package last Spring, and I feel
providing a dataset is necessary for even a basic use of snpeff, which, I
think, makes the design of an autopkgtest difficult.
But if anyone has specific ideas -- maybe you, Steffen? -- I would be really
happy to implement them. Or else, I will have a look again!
I realised that you commited 5.1+dfsg which builds nicely for me and
also fixes the watch file (which I'm hunting for in all our packages).
Do you have any reason to wait with uploading the current status in Git?
Ha, this is the second time today I see I should have put information in
d/changelog for such case ;) sorry for not doing it, next time I will.
I mean, if we can't provide an autopkgtest yet the current Git has a
lot of advantages for our users.
Yes, just before looking at king/libpdfbox-graphics2d-java I was
updating snpeff and seeing if I could turn some unit tests into
autopkgtests -- and I trust I can, this is my current task.
So if you think putting snpeff can be delayed 2 or 3 days, let's just
wait I write the tests. Else, please consider uploading, this is fine :)