Hello, I pushed a couple of changes to gdcm [1], in order to address the important bug #989296, which ended up bumped to serious. I'm not 100% confident I grasped the problem at play, but with the window for bringing changes now closing, I'm afraid I can't afford spending too much more time on verifications. I intend to file a (pre?) approval request to the Release Team and upload, maybe tomorrow or Saturday. [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/gdcm/ I am not a cmake expert, and am not sure how to reproduce #989296, so I would appreciate if someone could have a seconde look, just to make sure that what I wrapped up was sound. FYI, I already ran a bunch of build and autopkgtest with the numerous reverse build dependencies of libgdcm-dev in Testing, and I have not witnessed any regression. So, I'm tempted to think I am on the right track. Have a nice day, :) -- Étienne Mollier <emollier@emlwks999.eu> Fingerprint: 8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c 8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da Sent from /dev/pts/2, please excuse my verbosity.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature