[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please update sight packaging



OK, thanks!  FWIW, testing has had the same glibc version as unstable
(2.32-4) for about a week now, and AFAICT cmake from unstable is
installable in testing (though you will naturally also need to upgrade
cmake-data to match, and likewise for whichever of cmake-doc and/or
cmake-*-gui you have installed).

-- Aaron

Flavien Bridault <flavien.bridault@ircad.fr> writes:

> Hi Andreas,
>
> Thanks for the notice, actually I already started working on it few weeks ago. I just forgot to push my changes.
>
> I just did it however, I am currently stuck because of the current version of CMake in testing. Patching would be really tough, so I am waiting for CMake 3.21
> to reach testing, which should occur quite soon. We could still upload to unstable though, but before I would like to test the apps running in a VM with
> debian unstable (I only have testing at the moment and the libc is not compatible, so I can't use my package generated with unstable on testing).
>
> I'll keep you aware.
>
> Cheers
>
> Dr. Flavien BRIDAULT                                     IRCAD France             
> Director of Software Development                     http://www.ircad.fr/         
> IRCAD France & IRCAD Africa                        http://www.ircad.africa/       
>
> flavien.bridault@ircad.fr                        Suivez l'IRCAD sur  Facebook     
> Tél. : +33 (0)3 88 119 201                                                        
>
>                                    IRCAD France                                   
> Hôpitaux Universitaires - 1, place de l'Hôpital - 67091 Strasbourg Cedex - FRANCE 
> Le 01/10/2021 à 13:13, Andreas Tille a écrit :
>
>     Hi Flavien,
>
>     sight watch file needed to be fixed which I did and I realised there is
>     a new upstream version.  Please update the patches (if needed) and ping
>     here once the package is ready for uploading.
>
>     Kind regards and thanks for caring for this package
>
>          Andreas.


Reply to: