[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is pigx-rnaseq ready to be uploaded?



On 9/13/21 11:07 PM, Steffen Möller wrote:
> 
> On 13.09.21 18:27, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> r-cran-gprofiler2, last missing dep of pigx-rnaseq has been accepted some hours ago.
> This is great news. Thank you for the upload. I just installed it. Was
> not aware that gprofiler2 removes an already installed gprofiler.

You ACKed a Breaks+Replaces here[1], and that was the plan, I believe.

[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2021/07/msg00106.html

>> However, I see that you've added this line in d/ch: "hisat2 - upstream changed default genomic aligner"
>> What would this mean? There's no upstream release for hisat2, as I saw, what needs to be done to get this in then?
> 
> The package already ships in Debian. This was just that d/changelog is
> also meant to summarize what is new in the respective release.

OK, so this was for summary, and not for any TODO, right?

> d/control
> put it as
>                hisat2|rna-star <!nocheck>,
> which is not perfectly correct, I tend to think, since one would need to
> adjust the testing for rna-star if I get this right.

I don't know about the software myself, if you could take a look and push what
you deem sensible, that'd be very cool.
 
> I just wanted to build this but went into
> 
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  r-bioc-deseq2 : Depends: r-api-bioc-3.1
> Once that is in I can do the cowbuilding. But otherwise it is just fine.

Ah, yes. This is bit with the bioconductor transition as well. I'll hopefully upload this one in a while.
Maybe by tomorrow evening, I hope.
 

>> Also, with r-cran-gprofiler2, r-cran-grofiler is now obsolete. pigx-rnaseq was the last package which was needing it,
>> and with the new release this will also go away. I don't see a point in keeping cran-grpofiler around anymore.
>> Would you object it's removal?
>> Also, @Andreas, what d'you think?
> 
> r-cran-gprofiler should not make it into the next release. But I do not
> see a point into removing it from testing. I suggest to file an RC bug
> against it, so we do not forget about it.
> But do not immediately ask for
> its removal.

Filed #994212

Cheers,

-- 
Nilesh Patra

Debian Developer, Uploading
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   nilesh@debian.org / nileshpatra.info / tchncs.de
  ⠈⠳⣄

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: