Re: Acquiring Dental RVG on Linux
- To: "Aaron M. Ucko" <ucko@debian.org>
- Cc: debian-med@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Acquiring Dental RVG on Linux
- From: Sonali Warunjikar <sonali.warunjikar@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2021 08:32:49 +0530
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20210101030249.GA7041@localhost>
- In-reply-to: <udlr1n5ags8.fsf@mit.edu>
- References: <20201229094037.GA7029@localhost> <X+u+DWqVnUMVuqAv@hermes.hilbert.loc> <20201230042554.GA22790@localhost> <20201231084533.GA18313@localhost> <20201231110518.GB13498@localhost> <trinity-12eefcb5-e3fb-484f-ac58-7be785897748-1609422435087@3c-app-gmx-bap25> <20201231141901.GA27563@localhost> <udlv9chalta.fsf@mit.edu> <20201231185915.GA17253@localhost> <udlr1n5ags8.fsf@mit.edu>
On Thu, Dec 31, 2020 at 02:59:03PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Thanks for posting this! It looks like raw 12-bit little-endian data,
> with byte ranges alternating between [0, 255] and [0, 15]; I get
> plausible results with the below patch:
You just gave me a new year's gift! It was so important to observe the
ff-0f pattern in the hexdump which I had missed.
Yes, it's now closer to a real X ray. The Dr still sees some problems, but
I think it will need some experiments with exposure, brightness and
contrast. I don't think there is any software issue left.
Thanks and best wishes for the new year.
Reply to: