Re: [RFS] libpdb-redo

To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [RFS] libpdb-redo
From: "Maarten L. Hekkelman" <maarten@hekkelman.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 13:18:23 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 85fd80dd-9fd8-16aa-9be1-d6e860541920@hekkelman.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20201208110409.GA21670@an3as.eu>
References: <[🔎] 4e9b496c-1f86-0c7d-1970-72645ede82a4@hekkelman.com> <[🔎] 20201208110409.GA21670@an3as.eu>

Hi Andreas,

Op 08-12-2020 om 12:04 schreef Andreas Tille:

thanks again for your contribution.  I'm afraid there is another cut-n-pasto
in d/copyright:

    Upstream-Name: libcifpp
    Source: http://github.com/PDB-REDO/libcifpp

Otherswise it seems to be fine for sponsoring.


I wonder if I will ever contribute a package without errors... :-/

But this one is fixed now.

regards, -maarten

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFS] libpdb-redo
  - From: Andrius Merkys <merkys@debian.org>

References:
- [RFS] libpdb-redo
  - From: "Maarten L. Hekkelman" <maarten@hekkelman.com>
- Re: [RFS] libpdb-redo
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFS] libpdb-redo
Next by Date: some bioconductor packages up for peer review
Previous by thread: Re: [RFS] libpdb-redo
Next by thread: Re: [RFS] libpdb-redo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread