Re: Bug#972004: Assembly code not working for mips64el and ppc64el (Was: Bug#972004: bowtie ftbfs on several release architectures)
- To: Debian Med Project List <debian-med@lists.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#972004: Assembly code not working for mips64el and ppc64el (Was: Bug#972004: bowtie ftbfs on several release architectures)
- From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2020 14:06:03 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20201013120603.GI14557@an3as.eu>
- In-reply-to: <20201013102140.GA1996700@fusion>
- References: <2595bca4-52ab-f83a-ffdf-c80213be42e9@debian.org> <20201012093636.GS17648@an3as.eu> <2595bca4-52ab-f83a-ffdf-c80213be42e9@debian.org> <20201012095041.GA2338@belkar.wrar.name> <20201012155638.GA14557@an3as.eu> <20201012202239.GA1908447@fusion> <20201013070652.GE14557@an3as.eu> <20201013102140.GA1996700@fusion>
Hi Étienne,
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 12:21:40PM +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Note I ended pushing some changes to the repository after some
> more verifications yesterday.
Thanks a lot.
> Andreas Tille, on 2020-10-13 09:06:52 +0200:
> > Hmmmm, may be I should remove third_party/cpuid.h in general?
> > Given its copyright informazion is
> > Copyright (C) 2007, 2008, 2009 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
> > that seems to be a pretty old copy of this file.
>
> I can confirm excluding third_party/cpuid.h does the job.
OK. Please note just mentioning it in Files-Excluded is not
sufficient. I recreated the tarball and uploaded. I also
opened an issue upstream[1] according to this.
> The diff below shows what I pushed to salsa yesterday; it is a
> bit different from my statement in my email, as I filter out
> x86_64 for setting POPCNT_CAPABILITY=0 instead of listing
> architectures that do not have this available
That's perfectly sensible - no idea why I made it that complicated.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] https://github.com/BenLangmead/bowtie/issues/117
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: