Re: [RFS] python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3
Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org> writes:
> Many, many thanks for your swift update.
No problem.
> I'm reverting most of
> my changes to python-biopython 1.78+dfsg-3 packaging to make
> sure no overrides risk interferring with your tuning during the
> build or autopkgtest, and bump the requirements to ncbi-blast+
> 2.10.1-3.
Good plan, thanks!
> My understanding is that it is now urgent to wait for
> ghostscript to be available again before further upload/rebuild
> attempt I guess.
You can technically upload sooner to get a better position in the queue
of packages waiting for ghostscript, but it probably won't make much
difference in practice.
--
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
http://www.mit.edu/~amu/ | http://stuff.mit.edu/cgi/finger/?amu@monk.mit.edu
Reply to: