Re: Charls new upstream version patch refresh help
Hi Mathieu,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 09:35:32AM +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> Also for reference with the uppercase change, I believe you are doing
> a SONAME change (SOVERSION was kept the same though). Someone with
> more experience should verify this will not create a mess (I suspect
> no since only GDCM is using this lib AFAIK and will fail miserably
> with 2.1.0).
Could you provide a patch for the charls packaging that does not break
gdcm?
Thanks a lot
Andreas.
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 9:08 AM Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > You need to use (arch-bits=64) and (arch-bits=32) to fix the buildds failures.
> >
> > Also, you shouldn't be doing this;
> >
> > -JpegLsDecode@Base 2.0.0+dfsg
> > +JpegLsDecode@Base 2.1.0+dfsg
> >
> > that defeat the whole purpose of the symbol files.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:23 PM Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
> > >
> > > Mathieu, could you lend a helping hand here?
> > >
> > > Kind regards, Andreas.
> > >
> > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 11:10:49AM +0100, Shayan Doust wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I am trying to satisfy this [bug] for the [charls] package. I have just imported the latest upstream tarball and have pushed all necessary changes.
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately, I am not too sure as to how to handle stl_symbols_hack.patch. Additionally, there is no test suite in place for this package so I am not sure what patches are now redundant in this version and can be removed.
> > > >
> > > > Any spare time on this is much appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Kind regards,
> > > > Shayan Doust
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > [bug]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960578
> > > > [charls]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/charls
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > http://fam-tille.de
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: