Re: Anybody up for Python3 port of pbgenomicconsensus? [jmm@inutil.org: Re: pbgenomicconsensus: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye]
Hi Antoni,
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 06:05:41AM +0000, Antoni Villalonga wrote:
> I've looked at that package some months ago (no progress done).
>
> At 'pbgenomicconsensus' d/changelog there is this TODO comment:
> "TODO: unanimity to get python3-consensuscore2"
>
> At 'unanimity' d/changelog there is also a TODO comment claiming build problems
> with latest 'libpbcopper' version.
>
> As 'unanimity' 3.3.0 is already uploaded, 'python3-consensuscore2' can be
> built. I think 'python3-consensuscore2' may be uploaded that way.
>
> 'pbgenomicconsensus' should build fine after uploading 'python3-consensuscore2'.
>
> Of course 'unanimity' will be outdated after both package uploads.
>
> Hope it helps.
> Let me know if I've misunderstood some steps here.
I think you are perfectly correct here. The thing is that unanimity is
not maintained upstream any more (and there is no public source code of
the successor - we can probably ask for it but currently this is the
situation). My question was rather directed to users of these packages:
Are these packages important for your work, would it be helpful if we
invest time into this code while we will be alone with this since
upstream moved on, etc.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: