Re: RFS: gasic
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 10:21:16PM +0530, Pranav Ballaney wrote:
> Indeed, I did forget to push. I had been working on these tests for hours
> and when they finally worked I got too excited to send the email. 😂
I can confirm that you are by far not the first team member who forgot
to push. ;-)
> Regarding bowtie: I use sbuild as of now, but I'll try making a chroot with
> pbuilder and running the tests.
> With the recently pushed changes, bowtie will no longer be required to test
> gasic, so these tests should pass for you as well, now.
I admit I do not consider it a drawback if we are testing other packages
that way. So *if* bowtie might have an issue it would be good to spot
it that way. But I think bwa is the more frequently used tool anyway so
its sensible to use this one.