Re: RFS: recan [ITP]
Hi, Andrius,
On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 1:25 PM <merkys@debian.org> wrote:
> I gave your packaging a quick look, and here are my comments:
>
> 1. For DebianMed team-maintained packages debian/control should list the
> DebianMed as the Maintainer, and you as the uploader. You may take chime
> as example:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/chime/-/blob/master/debian/control
>
> 2. debian/control misses Vcs-* items;
Fixed and pushed both above.
>
> 3. debian/copyright should list the upstream author as the copyright
> holder, not the PyPA. As for the copyright years, development history of
> recan could be checked (for example, via 'git log').
I forwarded the copyright statement issue to upstream [1]. I wrote
this by following the LICENCE.txt of upstream repository. This seems
upstream author's mistake, so forwarded.
[1] https://github.com/babinyurii/recan/issues/14
Thanks for your review.
Sincerely,
Sao I Kuan
saoikuan@gmail.com
Reply to: