Re: Typo in edam scopes or new format
On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 12:10:23PM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
> > Many thanks for spotting this. I have no reply from Matúš, yet. My
> > favorite solution would be to accept it either way. Otherwise, the
> > plural form should win since there are typically more than one scope
> > that a tool can be used for.
> >
> I missread this. It is about input(s)/output(s), not about scope(s). I
> like the singular form much better. Would not want to change that, really.
Please settle with **one** form, **change** it to the prefered form and
**stick** to this. The importer is checking for typos and either
singular or plural is a typo (whatever you decide). I'd love if we make
scientific decisions in biology and not linguistics.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: