Re: Suggested removal of mgltools from Debian (Was: SVN to Git migration status)
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: retitle -1 ROM: Please remove package mgltools-pmv
As the discussion below and the bug log shows: mgltools-pmv does not
start and nobody seems to have a clue to make it work.
Kind regards, Andreas.
On Mon, Jan 01, 2018 at 09:21:33PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi again - again,
>
> On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 10:46:05AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Hi again,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 02:24:18PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > > > * RC-buggy (#855494 :-()
> > > > This should have been addressed with that one upload of mine that apparently
> > > > had been lost before when the bug was addressed by upstream about two years
> > > > ago.
> > >
> > > But the program does not yet start. :-(
> >
> > Since a mgltools part now received a bug report (#883845) which I feel
> > responsible to some extend since I once cared for the removal of the
> > non-free image,
>
> I fixed this bug in mgltools-vision and when doing so I realisied that
> it is not my fault that the image popped up in the source tarball again.
> Its just the non-default way to create the upstream source (and thus my
> point that its a bad idea how this source is obtained is proven by
> another issue).
>
> > I hereby want to request a clear commitment of the
> > persons mentioned in the Uploaders field whether bug #855494 will be
> > fixed **soon** (= until 24.12.) to know whether it is worth spending
> > some effort into it,
>
> I'm a bit sad that my expectation that there was no commitment shown for
> the issue which keeps my motivation high to ask for removal of the
> package.
>
> In any case I took over the migration from SVN to Git since I now
> migrated *all* packaging stuff in SVN (also prospective packages) and so
> even may be removal candidates packaging might serve some purpose in
> case somebody will take over later again.
>
> When doing the migration I realised that there was packaging code for
>
>
> mgltools-cmolkit (1.5.7-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
>
> * New upstream version (Closes: #767144,#783547,
> lp:#821299,lp:1386091,lp:#1386163,lp:#1492762)
>
> -- Steffen Moeller <moeller@debian.org> Fri, 08 Jul 2016 17:54:14 +0200
>
>
> in SVN and all other mgltools-* packages are featuring upstream version
> 1.5.7 but cmolkit is remaining at 1.5.7~rc1+cvs.20140424 which is most
> probably unwanted. If the get-orig-source method would not have failed
> I would have injected the upgraded source but it did not worked :-(((
>
> > or whether it is better to ask for removal since
> > we have no manpower to solve RC bugs.
>
> I'll wait with the request for removal until after our sprint.
>
> One more word to the "ftpmasters don't like a tarball of tarballs" [1]
> workaround: There should be other ways to deal with this "don't like"
> than putting 20 times multiple work than necessary to switch to new
> versions. It took me an additional day in the SVN to Git migration.
> Thus I removed myself from Uploaders which means I'll now consequently
> leave the additional work to the remaining Uploaders who seem to prefer
> this kind of workflow.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-med/2017/12/msg00010.html
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: