Re: [Debian-med-packaging] Bug#934600: gffread in cufflinks seems to be the same codebase but older
On 8/20/19 7:16 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> it looks as if the gffread code in cufflinks would be the
> same code base but the code in gffread source seems to be
> more recent. What do you think?
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> ----- Forwarded message from Debian testing autoremoval watch <noreply@release.debian.org> -----
>
> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2019 04:39:04 +0000
> From: Debian testing autoremoval watch <noreply@release.debian.org>
> To: cufflinks@packages.debian.org
> Subject: cufflinks is marked for autoremoval from testing
>
> cufflinks 2.2.1+dfsg.1-3 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2019-09-10
>
> It is affected by these RC bugs:
> 934600: cufflinks,gffread: both ship /usr/bin/gffread
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Debian-med-packaging mailing list
> Debian-med-packaging@alioth-lists.debian.net
> https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-med-packaging
>
> ----- End forwarded message -----
>
Hi Andreas,
I wasn't aware of gffread as a separate project.
If it is a successor of cufflink's gffread we can stop shipping gffread
with cufflinks package and add gffread package into Suggested for cufflinks.
I'll wait for some clarifications from the upstream and modify the
cufflinks package accordingly.
https://github.com/gpertea/gffread/issues/40
Best regards,
Alex
Reply to: