Hello Andrius, Yes, mmseqs2. I also assume now the package is OK. If I recall correctly, it was an email with the subject "mmseqs2_9-d36de+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED" sent to Andreas, debian-med-packaging and I. Regards, Shayan Doust On 09/08/2019 16:30, merkys@debian.org wrote: > Hi Shayan, > > On 2019-07-28 02:48, Shayan Doust wrote: >> A question about the FTP masters email we got a few days ago. Out of >> curiosity, what do you think this could be caused from in your opinion? >> >> The size hashes are fairly close to each other, so I think the tarballs >> are still related and not vastly different to each other. Additionally, >> are all new packages each hand processed and checked by some DDs or is >> there a pipelined / automated process accompanying this? > > Are you talking about mmseqs2 package here? I don't remember getting an > email from FTP masters regarding it. The package seems to be in the NEW > queue [1], so I guess that any problems with it were transient. > > Best, > Andrius > > [1] https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html > >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature