[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Odil : getting back into testing



For these "leaf" packages in the tree of package dependencies I agree with Michael that we should possibly just "leave" them. Then again, someone deeply caring for that architecture should have a chance to easily find these packages and address the issue.

On 04.01.19 20:32, Michael Crusoe wrote:
I'm increasingly of the opinion that we should not stretch our limited resources even thinner by spending so much time on architectures used for network routers where it is unlikely that anyone will want to view medical image files.

În vin., 4 ian. 2019 la 18:40, Julien Lamy <lamy@unistra.fr <mailto:lamy@unistra.fr>> a scris:

    Hi all,
    The latest version of Odil does not build on mips64el [1] and if
    I'm not
    mistaken, this is the only thing preventing the package to migrate to
    testing. By going through the logs, one of the unit tests times
    out when
    building [2]. Since I don't have access to a real mips64el box, I've
    tested building in a Qemu guest and got similar results: the build
    also
    fails with a timeout, albeit earlier in the process.

    I've watched the RAM during the Qemu build ("grep Committed_AS
    /proc/meminfo"), and it is getting nowhere the limit at this point of
    the build, which makes me think that this is not caused by a RAM
    problem. The configuration of the Qemu guest differs from the official
    builder due to Qemu limitations (less RAM, non-parallel build), so
    this
    is not the best test setup, and I'm unsure on how to fix this. The
    three
    options I've thought of are rather unsatisfactory:

    - Don't build the unit tests. Later build steps are however much more
    resource-intensive, so this will probably not solve the problem
    - Increase the build timeout. Not sure whether asking to
    reconfigure the
    buildd network for a package with such a low popcon is a good idea :)
    - Don't build Odil on mips64el

    What would be your advice in this situation ?

    [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=odil&suite=sid
    [2] test_webservices_WADORSRequest has a start message ("Building CXX
    object"), but no end message ("Built target")

    Cheers,
-- Julien



--
Michael R. Crusoe
Co-founder & Lead, Common Workflow Language project <http://www.commonwl.org/>
Direktorius, VšĮ "Darbo eigos", Vilnius, Lithuania
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2961-9670 <https://impactstory.org/u/0000-0002-2961-9670>
mrc@commonwl.org <mailto:mrc@commonwl.org>


Reply to: