Re: Test for sra-sdk
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 12:45:54PM +0200, Liubov Chuprikova wrote:
> > Seems that was a classical mis-communication. I assumed *you* would
> > have injected the new version in Debian packaging Git on Salsa (since
> > I suggested to write the tests for the latest version).
>
>
> Sorry, but I was not even thinking about you assuming me to inject the new
> version.. What I thought is that you had checked the package's homepage and
> there had not been any updates to the version 2.9.1, so you offered me to
> add tests for the version 2.9.0. Since I usually just run all the package's
> tools using some test data, I believed that even if this new version was on
> its way, the tools would not change so much that I would need to rewrite
> the tests completely.
No matter what injecting a new tarball is no magic at all. I'd
recommend to try next time. ;-)
> On Sat, 30 Jun 2018 at 07:24 Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
>
> I tried to recreate an original tarball from the repository, but
> pristine-tar failed with the following error message:
>
> xdelta3: target window checksum mismatch: XD3_INVALID_INPUT
> xdelta3: normally this indicates that the source file is incorrect
> xdelta3: please verify the source file with sha1sum or equivalent
> pristine-tar: Failed to reproduce original tarball. Please file a bug
> report.
Hmmm, I remember that there was some issue with trying to build
on a stable (Ubuntu??) system what was injected with testing or
unstable.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: