Re: bart: version 0.4.04

["Uecker, Martin" <Martin.Uecker@med.uni-goettingen.de>]

>On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 09:52:07PM +0000, Uecker, Martin wrote:
> > 
> > I have another question: Would it be ok to use a dependency
> > on debhelper (>=10) instead of (>=11~) ? Then the package
> > could be build on stable without changes.
>
> There is no strict reason to enforce debhelper 11 - I'm just
> in favour of using the latest debhelper version if there is no
> good reason to pick an older one.
>
> BTW, I'm *intentionally* using 11~ since the tilde works for Stretch
> backports.  Debhelper 11 is in stretch backports and if you want to
> provide bart also on stable systems I'd recommend to do an official
> backport (just ping me if the version you prefer has hit testing and
> I'll do an upload to stretch-backports).
>
> Feel free to decide what solution you prefer with this additional
> information and tell me what you want me to sponsor.

Then let's keep it like it is and if it works on all architectures
and no other problems appear in the next week, I  would appreciate 
if could then upload to strech-backports.

I the mean time, I will see how one can request access to systems
with some of the problematic architectures...

Best,
Martin