Re: What flavour of dindel to we want to provide?
- To: debian-med@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: What flavour of dindel to we want to provide?
- From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
- Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2018 12:05:52 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20180803100552.43fy742grkeomvpl@an3as.eu>
- In-reply-to: <20180716130655.nd54mynlghegsg6s@an3as.eu>
- References: <20180716093022.uhr6nyq5swsgdc4z@an3as.eu> <CAPOrs_1b4+RFmBT45Y1VDwcXw2-3GRi6taeXcNyQ-YO9xkuEhA@mail.gmail.com> <20180716130655.nd54mynlghegsg6s@an3as.eu>
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 03:06:55PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > > This fork currently contains a patch to allow sequence data that
> > > includes the 0x800 flag (supplementary alignment) from newer versions of
> > > the SAM specification. It also removes the included copy of Boost and
> > > adds samtools-0.1.19 as a submodule.
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/genome-vendor/dindel
> > > [2] https://github.com/genome/dindel-tgi
> >
> > Is there any reason why the fork maintainers did not took over the
> > original tindel project? A fork would usually means that the original
> > will be continued but it doesn't look like this is the case.
> >
> > If upstream transferred the project, this would solve the problem for
> > us and also make it simpler for users.
I'vew droped an issue on Github:
https://github.com/genome/dindel-tgi/issues/3
Feel free to comment on this
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: