Re: SweeD - was Re: omegaMap
Hi Andreas,
On 7/4/18 9:54 AM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Steffen,
>
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:15:17AM +0200, Steffen Möller wrote:
>> It happened that I was reading a review on software that is about what
>> omegaMap is about if I am not erroneous. The authors did not reference
>> omegaMap, but compared the Open Source tools SweeD, SweepFinder,
>> SweepFinder2, and OmegaPlus:
>>
>> https://jbiolres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40709-017-0064-0?&utm_medium=other&utm_source=other&utm_content=4172018&utm_campaign=10_dann_ctw2018_1_bio_03 ;
>> (Open Access)
>>
>> I liked the name SweeD and it is from a place that once had summoned one
>> of their researchers to a Debian Med Sprint, so I spontaneously decided
>> to package it at https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/sweed. Comments welcome.
> Thanks for packaging this. I had some changes in Git (including
> changing the tarball to clean it up completely). Since I have not yet
> seen any upload I took the freedom to push the fixes - please delete
> your local tags and pull. I do not plan further changes.
Excellent. I wished the authors of such review papers would talk to us
so we could have packages in our distribution for the software they
positively evaluated.
> BTW, for everybody who intends to start with a new package: Please
> write debian/watch and Files-Excluded in d/copyright first and use it to
> obtain the upstream tarball. You save manual work and the way to obtain
> the doc is perfectly documented. May be I should hereby send another
> advertising for the package template I'm using:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/community/package_template
I admittedly had not looked at this for ages. It is nice. The watch file
in particular.
Have you talked back to the dh_make people about it?
Best,
Steffen
Reply to: