Liubov Chuprikova <chuprikovalv@gmail.com> writes:
> Please, have a look at my two last commits (
> https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/ncbi-tools6/commits/master). Actually,
> the first one was made a month ago.
All looks good except for one formality -- Lintian considers your
additions to debian/copyright to be incomplete:
W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright license (paragraph at line 16)
W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright copyright (paragraph at line 16)
W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright license (paragraph at line 24)
W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright copyright (paragraph at line 24)
W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright license (paragraph at line 30)
W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright copyright (paragraph at line 30)
W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright license (paragraph at line 35)
W: ncbi-tools6 source: missing-field-in-dep5-copyright copyright (paragraph at line 35)
(It also issues a few unrelated complaints, which I'll be happy to
address myself.)
I cannot reproduce the same lintian output on my computer. I tried it like this:
lintian -i -I --show-overrides ncbi-tools6_6.1.20170106-3_amd64.changes
I mistakenly decided that if NCBI copyright had already mentioned I could skip it
for test data files as they were also taken from NCBI, except one...
trnascan-se_sample.output
I generated that file by running trnascan-se (another Debian Med package), so I have no
idea what the license and copyright should be written for it. Could you help me with this
problem?
__
Liubov