[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CWL workflow as Debian package



GATK4 is DFSG compatible, GATK3 still has a non-DFSG core

https://github.com/ProteinsWebTeam/ebi-metagenomics-cwl is entirely based upon free software, but the reference libraries are quite large





2017-08-11 18:57 GMT+03:00 Steffen Möller <steffen.moeller@uni-rostock.de>:
Hello,

I had an exchange with Stian yesterday about what CWL workflow of his
database he would propose to use as an experience-gathering example. He
proposed the GATK workflow by Farah Zaib Khan et al. for being good to
cite about workflows and reproducibility.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-017-1747-0
https://github.com/skanwal/GATK-CaseStudy/tree/master/CWL

We have BWA, GATK and Picard Toolkit already in Debian from what I
understand (not sure about the state of GATK). Stian had pointed to
https://github.com/h3abionet/h3agatk/blob/master/workflows/GATK/GATK-complete-WES-Workflow-h3abionet.cwl
as a current variant of the same, but then again, I would not mind to
start with a smaller one. Any comments?

The main point for me is to have a small test case for running this
workflow repeatedly. We would hence also need to decide on appropriate
test data at some point. Should we also introduce a package like
"genome-human"?

Best,

Steffen





--
Michael R. Crusoe
Community Engineer & Co-founder
Common Workflow Language project
https://impactstory.org/u/0000-0002-2961-9670
mrc@commonwl.org
+1 480 627 9108

Reply to: